a
c
ti
vit
y
of the
fir
st par
t
y
in an a
rr
a
n
g
e
ment wh
e
re
b
y
the se
c
ond pa
rt
y
will
c
omm
e
nc
e
a
c
ti
vit
ies
of the
sa
me t
y
pe
of thos
e
e
nga
g
e
d in b
y
the f
i
rst pa
rt
y
but
without
a
n
y
re
qu
ire
d tra
ini
n
g
AN
D
without
the se
c
ond pa
rt
y
ha
ving
to foll
ow a
sp
e
c
ifi
c
"
d
a
y
-
t
o
-
da
y
busi
n
e
ss oper
a
ti
n
g
for
mat
"
a
s
de
fine
d b
y
the f
irst p
a
rt
y
.
Unde
r this def
ini
ti
on, the se
c
ond pa
rt
y
a
g
re
e
s t
o e
i
ther
off
e
r pr
oduc
ts,
g
ood
s, or se
rvic
e
s m
a
de
a
va
il
a
ble to him
throug
h
the f
irst par
t
y
, e
it
he
r di
re
c
tl
y
or thr
ou
g
h outs
ide v
e
ndors a
nd suppl
ier
s
with whom t
he
fir
st par
t
y
ha
s e
stablis
he
d a
r
e
latio
nshi
p that is
de
sig
ne
d in
some w
a
y
to bene
fit
the se
c
ond
pa
rt
y
in hi
s p
ursuit of thi
s a
c
ti
vit
y
.
F
inall
y
,
a
tra
ns
a
c
ti
on wo
uld qualif
y
a
s
a
"
B
usines
s Oppor
tuni
t
y
" i
f the
se
c
ond pa
rt
y
ha
s a
gre
e
d to
pa
y
a
n
y
one
o
r c
ombi
na
ti
on of
the f
oll
owing
to t
he
fir
st par
t
y
:
An up
-
fr
ont f
e
e
fo
r the
o
pportunit
y
to par
ti
c
ipate
i
n
the a
rr
a
n
g
e
ment or
busi
ne
ss opportuni
t
y
.
An on
-
g
oing
fe
e
b
a
se
d o
n e
it
he
r
g
ross sa
les, n
e
t sale
s, or pr
odu
c
t orde
rs
ge
ne
ra
ted b
y
the s
e
c
ond
pa
rt
y
,
with t
he
de
finiti
on fo
r "
on
-
g
oin
g
fe
e
s"
a
lso t
o include
a
n
y
fe
e
s int
e
g
r
a
ted into t
he
c
ost paid
b
y
the se
c
ond p
a
rt
y
for
p
roduc
ts, g
oods, o
r se
rvic
e
s provide
d to hi
m b
y
the
fir
st par
t
y
.
The
que
sti
on ha
s be
e
n
ra
i
se
d a
s to whe
the
r the
doll
a
r a
mount
of $5
00.00 a
s t
he
"
tri
gg
e
rin
g
leve
l
"
of a
n
y
fina
n
c
ial tra
nsa
c
ti
on in "
B
usiness Opp
ortu
nit
y
"
a
rr
a
n
g
e
ment shoul
d
be
lowe
re
d
.
I
t i
s m
y
opini
on that the $500.00 "
tri
gg
e
rin
g
lev
e
l
"
shoul
d not be lowe
r
e
d.
At the le
ve
l of
$500.00, virtuall
y
a
ll
"
B
u
siness Oppor
tuni
ti
e
s"
tha
t would be qua
li
fie
d unde
r a
n
y
of the
provisions
spe
c
ifie
d a
bov
e
will
be
c
ove
r
e
d a
s v
e
r
y
fe
w, if
a
n
y
, o
f those
t
y
pe
s of c
ompanie
s
would ha
ve
struc
tur
e
d a
f
e
e
a
n
y
low
e
r tha
n $500.0
0 a
s a
pra
c
ti
c
a
l r
e
a
li
t
y
o
f
the e
c
onomi
c
s of on
-
g
oin
g
busi
ne
ss a
c
ti
vit
y
in Amer
ica
.
Que
sti
on/Topi
c
: C
ondit
i
ona
l ex
e
mpt
ion for
Tr
a
de
S
how Promot
e
rs.
C
omm
e
nt/
R
e
sponse:
I
a
gre
e
with t
hose
who
fe
e
l t
ha
t t
he
C
omm
iss
ion sh
ou
ld continue to pr
ovide
a
n e
x
e
mpt
ion for
Tr
a
de
S
how Promot
e
rs pr
ovided
that the
y
mak
e
a
v
a
il
a
ble
to attende
e
s a
t t
he
ir
shows a
"
sp
e
c
ific
c
onsu
mer
e
duc
a
ti
on noti
c
e
."
Tr
a
de
S
how Promot
e
rs
a
re
not fr
a
n
c
hise br
ok
e
rs n
or a
re
th
e
y
dir
e
c
tl
y
or ind
ire
c
tl
y
a
ff
il
iate
d
with
the f
ra
n
c
hisor e
x
hibi
tors a
t t
he
ir shows. F
urth
e
rm
ore
, it
would be
virtua
ll
y
im
possi
ble f
or T
ra
de
S
how Promot
e
rs to de
ter
mi
ne
whe
ther
or no
t f
ra
n
c
hisors e
x
hibi
ti
ng
in t
he
ir shows a
re
in
c
ompl
e
te, pa
rtia
l, or non
-
c
ompl
ian
c
e
with The
R
ul
e
or a
n
y
othe
r F
TC r
e
g
ulations.
I
t i
s poss
ibl
e
for
T
ra
de
S
how Promot
e
rs to r
e
quire
a
nd to enf
or
c
e
a
re
quir
e
ment that a
ll
fr
a
nc
hisors
e
x
hibi
ti
ng
in t
he
ir shows ha
ve
"
a
v
a
il
a
ble f
or pu
bli
c
inspec
ti
on
" a c
urr
e
nt UF
OC
Of
fe
ring
C
irc
ular
doc
um
e
nt.
This re
quire
ment wo
uld m
e
a
n a
nd shoul
d c
on
ti
nue
to re
quire
that
e
a
c
h f
ra
n
c
hisor maintain
a
n a
c
tual
c
op
y
of the
U
F
OC a
t t
he
booth, not
for
dist
ributi
on but ra
ther
for
"
ph
y
si
c
a
l ex
a
mi
na
ti
on"
b
y
a
n
y
a
tt
e
nde
e
a
t t
he
show w
ho re
que
sts
to se
e
a
UF
OC.
2
3
a
c
ti
vit
y
of the
fir
st par
t
y
in an a
rr
a
n
g
e
ment wh
e
re
b
y
the se
c
ond pa
rt
y
will
c
omm
e
nc
e
a
c
ti
vit
ies
of the
sa
me t
y
pe
of thos
e
e
nga
g
e
d in b
y
the f
i
rst pa
rt
y
but
without
a
n
y
re
qu
ire
d tra
ini
n
g
AN
D
without
the se
c
ond pa
rt
y
ha
ving
to foll
ow a
sp
e
c
ifi
c
"
d
a
y
-
t
o
-
da
y
busi
n
e
ss oper
a
ti
n
g
for
mat
"
a
s
de
fine
d b
y
the f
irst p
a
rt
y
.
Unde
r this def
ini
ti
on, the se
c
ond pa
rt
y
a
g
re
e
s t
o e
i
ther
off
e
r pr
oduc
ts,
g
ood
s, or se
rvic
e
s m
a
de
a
va
il
a
ble to him
throug
h
the f
irst par
t
y
, e
it
he
r di
re
c
tl
y
or thr
ou
g
h outs
ide v
e
ndors a
nd suppl
ier
s
with whom t
he
fir
st par
t
y
ha
s e
stablis
he
d a
r
e
latio
nshi
p that is
de
sig
ne
d in
some w
a
y
to bene
fit
the se
c
ond
pa
rt
y
in hi
s p
ursuit of thi
s a
c
ti
vit
y
.
F
inall
y
,
a
tra
ns
a
c
ti
on wo
uld qualif
y
a
s
a
"
B
usines
s Oppor
tuni
t
y
" i
f the
se
c
ond pa
rt
y
ha
s a
gre
e
d to
pa
y
a
n
y
one
o
r c
ombi
na
ti
on of
the f
oll
owing
to t
he
fir
st par
t
y
:
An up
-
fr
ont f
e
e
fo
r the
o
pportunit
y
to par
ti
c
ipate
i
n
the a
rr
a
n
g
e
ment or
busi
ne
ss opportuni
t
y
.
An on
-
g
oing
fe
e
b
a
se
d o
n e
it
he
r
g
ross sa
les, n
e
t sale
s, or pr
odu
c
t orde
rs
ge
ne
ra
ted b
y
the s
e
c
ond
pa
rt
y
,
with t
he
de
finiti
on fo
r "
on
-
g
oin
g
fe
e
s"
a
lso t
o include
a
n
y
fe
e
s int
e
g
r
a
ted into t
he
c
ost paid
b
y
the se
c
ond p
a
rt
y
for
p
roduc
ts, g
oods, o
r se
rvic
e
s provide
d to hi
m b
y
the
fir
st par
t
y
.
The
que
sti
on ha
s be
e
n
ra
i
se
d a
s to whe
the
r the
doll
a
r a
mount
of $5
00.00 a
s t
he
"
tri
gg
e
rin
g
leve
l
"
of a
n
y
fina
n
c
ial tra
nsa
c
ti
on in "
B
usiness Opp
ortu
nit
y
"
a
rr
a
n
g
e
ment shoul
d
be
lowe
re
d
I
t i
s m
y
opini
on that the $500.00 "
tri
gg
e
rin
g
lev
e
l
"
shoul
d not be lowe
r
e
d.
At the le
ve
l of
$500.00, virtuall
y
a
ll
"
B
u
siness Oppor
tuni
ti
e
s"
tha
t would be qua
li
fie
d unde
r a
n
y
of the
provisions
spe
c
ifie
d a
bov
e
will
be
c
ove
r
e
d a
s v
e
r
y
fe
w, if
a
n
y
, o
f those
t
y
pe
s of c
ompanie
s
would ha
ve
struc
tur
e
d a
f
e
e
a
n
y
low
e
r tha
n $500.0
0 a
s a
pra
c
ti
c
a
l r
e
a
li
t
y
o
f
the e
c
onomi
c
s of on
g
oin
g
busi
ne
ss a
c
ti
vit
y
in Amer
ica
.
Que
sti
on/Topi
c
: C
ondit
i
ona
l ex
e
mpt
ion for
Tr
a
de
S
how Promot
e
rs.
C
omm
e
nt/
R
e
sponse:
I
a
gre
e
with t
hose
who
fe
e
l t
ha
t t
he
C
omm
iss
ion sh
ou
ld continue to pr
ovide
a
n e
x
e
mpt
ion for
Tr
a
de
S
how Promot
e
rs pr
ovided
that the
y
mak
e
a
v
a
il
a
ble
to attende
e
s a
t t
he
ir
shows a
"
sp
e
c
ific
c
onsu
mer
e
duc
a
ti
on noti
c
e
."
Tr
a
de
S
how Promot
e
rs
a
re
not fr
a
n
c
hise br
ok
e
rs n
or a
re
th
e
y
dir
e
c
tl
y
or ind
ire
c
tl
y
a
ff
il
iate
d
with
the f
ra
n
c
hisor e
x
hibi
tors a
t t
he
ir shows. F
urth
e
rm
ore
, it
would be
virtua
ll
y
im
possi
ble f
or T
ra
de
S
how Promot
e
rs to de
ter
mi
ne
whe
ther
or no
t f
ra
n
c
hisors e
x
hibi
ti
ng
in t
he
ir shows a
re
in
c
ompl
e
te, pa
rtia
l, or non
-
c
ompl
ian
c
e
with The
R
ul
e
or a
n
y
othe
r F
TC r
e
g
ulations.
I
t i
s poss
ibl
e
for
T
ra
de
S
how Promot
e
rs to r
e
quire
a
nd to enf
or
c
e
a
re
quir
e
ment that a
ll
fr
a
nc
hisors
e
x
hibi
ti
ng
in t
he
ir shows ha
ve
"
a
v
a
il
a
ble f
or pu
bli
c
inspec
ti
on
" a c
urr
e
nt UF
OC
Of
fe
ring
C
irc
ular
doc
um
e
nt.
This re
quire
ment wo
uld m
e
a
n a
nd shoul
d c
on
ti
nue
to re
quire
that
e
a
c
h f
ra
n
c
hisor maintain
a
n a
c
tual
c
op
y
of the
U
F
OC a
t t
he
booth, not
for
dist
ributi
on but ra
ther
for
"
ph
y
si
c
a
l ex
a
mi
na
ti
on"
b
y
a
n
y
a
tt
e
nde
e
a
t t
he
show w
ho re
que
sts
to se
e
a
UF
OC.
2
3
